<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alanguilan dot com weblog &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alanguilan.com/index.php/category/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alanguilan.com</link>
	<description>times in a tech life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>blog reorg</title>
		<link>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/12/14/blog-reorg/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/12/14/blog-reorg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/12/14/wordpress/470.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think i need to reorganize/consolidate my blogs. i have a couple more someplace else and it may be time to put them all in one place for easier maintenance. i&#8217;m getting tired of posting to three places (or is it four?). and more is not necessarily better. its just more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think i need to reorganize/consolidate my blogs. i have a couple more someplace else and it may be time to put them all in one place for easier maintenance.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m getting tired of posting to three places (or is it four?). and more is not necessarily better. its just <em>more</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/12/14/blog-reorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>filezilla and yahoo</title>
		<link>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/filezilla-and-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/filezilla-and-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/software/464.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you&#8217;re on yahoo! web hosting and trying to upload your wordpress installation files via ftp it may interest you to know that, apparently, yahoo doesn&#8217;t like a lot of simultaneous ftp connections from a single ip address. i found that out when i was trying to upload a set of wordpress upgrade files to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you&#8217;re on yahoo! web hosting and trying to upload your wordpress installation files via ftp it may interest you to know that, apparently, yahoo doesn&#8217;t like a lot of simultaneous ftp connections from a single ip address. i found that out when i was trying to upload a set of wordpress upgrade files to the server.</p>
<p>my solution was to limit connections to just one (1). it will take a longer time, yes but the files should be able to get to their destination properly.</p>
<p><img class="centered" src="http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/onexfer.png" alt="one connection only" /></p>
<p>and if you&#8217;re behind a firewall, try using passive connections.</p>
<p><img class="centered" src="http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/pasv.png" alt="passive transfer" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/filezilla-and-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>fox leaks memory</title>
		<link>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/fox-leaks-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/fox-leaks-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/software/462.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[firefox on ubuntu leaks a lot of memory &#8212; maybe more than when i was running it in windows. so my regimen now would be after visiting a few websites i close-open firefox. tedious i know. and opera is available in ubuntu. i have that installed also but i don&#8217;t use it enough for everyday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firefox on ubuntu leaks a lot of memory &#8212; maybe more than when i was running it in windows.</p>
<p><img class="centered" src="http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/sysmonff.png" alt="firefox at 130 meg" /></p>
<p>so my regimen now would be after visiting a few websites i close-open firefox. tedious i know. and <a href="http://www.opera.com/">opera</a> <em>is</em> available in ubuntu. i have that installed also but i don&#8217;t use it enough for everyday work or surfing. maybe i should.</p>
<p>i would like to see internet explorer run natively in linux though. but i guess that&#8217;ll happen when hell freezes over (you know that concert? <img src='http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>the good news is that firefox 3 is coming and in the beta 1 incarnation it <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=958">appears to be fast</a>. and according to mozilla, they have <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.0b1/releasenotes/">fixed over <em>300</em> memory leaks</a>.  dang! <em>300?!?!</em> it also appears that ff3b1 consumes just as much memory as ff2 but leaks less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/29/fox-leaks-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>pldt slow part 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/pldt-slow-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/pldt-slow-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/internet/460.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i got a report that a pldt contractor dropped by the site again to check the connection. he suggested that the reason the connection to the internet is slow is because there are too many people sharing the connection. i&#8217;ve heard this load of crap before and apparently so did the client&#8217;s representative that was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/pldtslow2.png" alt="pldt slow part 2" class="centered" /></p>
<p>i got a report that a pldt contractor dropped by the site again to check the connection. he suggested that the reason the connection to the internet is slow is because there are too many people sharing the connection.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve heard this load of crap before and apparently so did the client&#8217;s representative that was coordinating with the pldt guy. she said that if that is the case then how come the dsl connection wasn&#8217;t slow before? we had the same number of users <em>before</em> it slowed and <em>after</em> it slowed.</p>
<p>didn&#8217;t get an answer after that.</p>
<p>dude, no matter how many users are accessing/sharing the internet connection, it would just hit the max dsl speed and then sustain it until the demand for the connection diminishes. so far the max i&#8217;m getting from the stats is shown above &#8212; 16kbytes/sec. that is not near enough to the 45 kbytes/sec that i was getting before. and <em>that</em> was when we had more people accessing the internet.</p>
<p>move the link to a faster port or we move to another service provider.</p>
<p>banyantel and globe are already checking if they have lines in the area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/pldt-slow-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>gmail @ 5 gig</title>
		<link>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/gmail-5-gig/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/gmail-5-gig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/stuff/457.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is it just me or has anyone noticed that gmail&#8216;s space counter jumped to 5 gig? compared to yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;unlimited&#8221; space, 5 gig is &#8220;small&#8221;. but heck, 5 gig is still plenty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/gmail5gig.png" alt="gmail at 5 gig" class="centered" /></p>
<p>is it just me or has anyone noticed that <a href="http://mail.google.com/">gmail</a>&#8216;s space counter jumped to 5 gig? compared to yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;unlimited&#8221; space, 5 gig is &#8220;small&#8221;.  <img src='http://blog.alanguilan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   but heck, 5 gig is still plenty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alanguilan.com/2007/11/20/gmail-5-gig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

